When Control Matters Most

Services like Tailscale and NetBird are convenient, but they rely on a third-party control server responsible for authentication, key distribution, and route exchange. For those who, for security or privacy reasons, don’t want to entrust this function to anyone, there are two paths: Headscale and “pure” WireGuard.

Headscale: Your Own Tailscale

Headscale is a fully open-source implementation of Tailscale’s control server. It allows you to deploy your own Tailscale alternative on a VPS or server while still using the official Tailscale clients.

How it works: You install Headscale on your server and authorize your devices in it. Headscale performs the same role as Tailscale’s servers:

1. Manages WireGuard keys.
2. Notifies devices about each other’s availability.
3. Provides NAT Traversal so devices can connect even behind complex routers.

Pros of Headscale:

• Full control: You own all the data and keys.
• Open-source: You can audit the code and be sure there are no backdoors.
• Familiar UI: You use the convenient, feature-rich Tailscale clients.
• No limitations: No caps on the number of devices or users.

Cons:

• Requires your own server.
• Needs initial setup and ongoing maintenance.

Self-Managed WireGuard: Maximum Minimalism

If you want to completely avoid a central control server and gain absolute control, you can configure WireGuard manually. This is the most fundamental approach.

How it works: You need to manually:

1. Generate a key pair (private and public) for each device.
2. Configure each device with the public keys and IP addresses of all others.
3. Adjust firewall rules and routing on routers to bypass NAT.

Pros of self-managed WireGuard:

• Complete independence: No third-party services involved.
• Maximum performance: No extra code, only what’s needed for the tunnel.
• Transparency: You control every aspect of your network.

Cons:

• Complexity: Requires deep networking knowledge.
• No central management: Adding new devices and handling keys is manual.
• NAT challenges: NAT traversal needs extra tools (e.g., hole-punching), making setup harder.

Conclusion

The choice between Tailscale and DIY solutions comes down to convenience versus full control. Tailscale provides a flawless experience for most users. However, for those who want to own their infrastructure, Headscale is the best compromise — offering a familiar interface with complete control. And for hardcore enthusiasts who value absolute transparency and minimalism, there’s always “pure” WireGuard.

This concludes our series of articles on modern VPN services. We hope it helped you understand the concept of mesh networks and choose the solution that best fits your needs.